jsharpe¶
A Python library for rigorous Sharpe ratio analysis and statistical testing.
Overview¶
jsharpe provides comprehensive tools for evaluating trading strategies through the lens of statistical significance. Based on the research of Marcos Lopez de Prado, this library goes beyond simple Sharpe ratio calculations to answer the critical question: Is this strategy's performance statistically significant, or could it be due to chance?
Key Features¶
- Probabilistic Sharpe Ratio (PSR) - Transform Sharpe ratios into probabilities that account for estimation uncertainty
- Non-Gaussian Returns - Correct for skewness and excess kurtosis in return distributions
- Autocorrelation Adjustment - Handle serial correlation in returns
- Multiple Testing Corrections - Control False Discovery Rate (FDR) and Family-Wise Error Rate (FWER) when testing multiple strategies
- Minimum Track Record Length - Determine how long you need to observe a strategy for statistical significance
- Portfolio Optimization - Minimum variance portfolio weights for correlated assets
Installation¶
Install jsharpe from PyPI:
Quick Start¶
Basic Probabilistic Sharpe Ratio¶
from jsharpe import probabilistic_sharpe_ratio
# Observed Sharpe ratio: 0.456 (e.g., 3.6% return / 7.9% volatility)
sr = 0.036 / 0.079
# Compute PSR with 24 monthly observations
# Testing against SR0=0 (no skill)
psr = probabilistic_sharpe_ratio(SR=sr, SR0=0, T=24)
print(f"PSR: {psr:.3f}") # Output: PSR: 0.987
The PSR of 0.987 means there's a 98.7% probability that the true Sharpe ratio exceeds zero.
Accounting for Non-Gaussian Returns¶
Real returns often exhibit negative skewness and excess kurtosis (fat tails):
from jsharpe import probabilistic_sharpe_ratio
sr = 0.036 / 0.079
# Include skewness and kurtosis estimates
psr = probabilistic_sharpe_ratio(
SR=sr,
SR0=0,
T=24,
gamma3=-2.448, # Negative skewness
gamma4=10.164 # Excess kurtosis
)
print(f"PSR (adjusted): {psr:.3f}") # Output: PSR (adjusted): 0.987
Minimum Track Record Length¶
How long must you observe a strategy to claim it's significantly better than a benchmark?
from jsharpe import minimum_track_record_length
# Strategy with SR=0.5, testing against SR0=0 at 95% confidence
months_needed = minimum_track_record_length(SR=0.5, SR0=0, alpha=0.05)
print(f"Months needed: {months_needed:.1f}")
Testing Multiple Strategies¶
When testing many strategies, control the False Discovery Rate:
from jsharpe import control_for_FDR
# Test 10 strategies, controlling FDR at 25%
alpha, beta, SR_critical, q_hat = control_for_FDR(
q=0.25, # Target FDR
SR0=0, # Null hypothesis
SR1=0.5, # Alternative hypothesis
p_H1=0.05, # Prior prob of true signal
T=24 # Observations per strategy
)
print(f"Critical SR threshold: {SR_critical:.3f}")
print(f"Only accept strategies with SR > {SR_critical:.3f}")
Variance of Sharpe Ratio Estimates¶
from jsharpe import sharpe_ratio_variance
import math
# Variance under Gaussian assumptions
var_gaussian = sharpe_ratio_variance(SR=0.5, T=24)
print(f"Std error (Gaussian): {math.sqrt(var_gaussian):.3f}")
# Variance with fat tails (higher kurtosis)
var_fat_tails = sharpe_ratio_variance(SR=0.5, T=24, gamma4=6.0)
print(f"Std error (fat tails): {math.sqrt(var_fat_tails):.3f}")
PSR: 0.987
PSR (adjusted): 0.987
Months needed: 10.8
Critical SR threshold: 0.479
Only accept strategies with SR > 0.479
Std error (Gaussian): 0.217
Std error (fat tails): 0.234
Core Functions¶
probabilistic_sharpe_ratio()- Compute PSR with various adjustmentssharpe_ratio_variance()- Variance of SR estimator under non-Gaussian returnsminimum_track_record_length()- Min observations for significancecritical_sharpe_ratio()- Threshold for hypothesis testingsharpe_ratio_power()- Statistical power of SR testcontrol_for_FDR()- False Discovery Rate control for multiple testingadjusted_p_values_bonferroni()- Bonferroni correctionadjusted_p_values_holm()- Holm's step-down procedureadjusted_p_values_sidak()- Šidák correctionminimum_variance_weights_for_correlated_assets()- Portfolio optimization
Documentation¶
- API Documentation - Complete API reference with detailed function documentation
- Interactive Notebooks - Explore PSR concepts with interactive Marimo notebooks
References¶
This library implements methods from:
- Bailey, D. H., & López de Prado, M. (2012). "The Sharpe Ratio Efficient Frontier." Journal of Risk, 15(2), 3-44.
- Bailey, D. H., & López de Prado, M. (2014). "The Deflated Sharpe Ratio: Correcting for Selection Bias, Backtest Overfitting and Non-Normality." Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(5), 94-107.
For Developers¶
Setup Development Environment¶
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/tschm/jsharpe.git
cd jsharpe
# Install dependencies and setup environment
make install
This installs uv, creates a virtual environment, and installs all dependencies.
Development Workflow¶
Project Structure¶
jsharpe/
├── src/jsharpe/ # Main package source code
│ ├── __init__.py # Public API exports
│ └── sharpe.py # Core implementations
├── tests/ # Test suite
│ ├── test_sharpe.py # Unit tests
│ ├── test_migration.py # Parity tests vs. the original implementation
│ └── fuzz/ # Atheris fuzz harness
├── book/ # Documentation and interactive notebooks
│ └── marimo/ # Marimo notebooks for exploration
└── pyproject.toml # Project metadata and dependencies
Contributing¶
We welcome contributions! Please:
- Fork the repository
- Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature) - Make your changes and add tests
- Run
make testandmake fmt - Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature') - Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature) - Open a Pull Request
See CONTRIBUTING.md for more details.
Running Tests¶
License¶
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
Citation¶
If you use jsharpe in your research, please cite: